Payment reminders. The first message arrives before the due date.
The May invoice still hasn't come in, and nobody noticed until there wasn't enough cash to pay a supplier. Then the awkward phone call, made late and badly. This piece keeps the calendar of due dates and sends the messages at the moments they are needed, checking first who has already paid.
The first message comes before the due date. It doesn't ask for money: it recalls number, date and amount, and asks for confirmation that everything is in order. It is the moment when a dispute comes out while there is still time.
Whoever has paid receives nothing. Before every send the system reconciles with the recorded payments, and those who are up to date leave the sequence on their own.
You raise the tone. The first steps are informative; late payment interest, the flat compensation and formal demands never go out automatically.
This is the page for a single piece of the system. The other pieces, and the criterion for choosing which to start from, are on the services page.
What changes in practice
Money comes in sooner because someone is always on it, even in the weeks when the business has other things to do. Due dates no longer depend on the memory of whoever handles the administration, and the first reminder goes out even on the day that person is on holiday.
The second change is the tone. A message sent three days before the due date is a service to the customer; the same message sent after sixty days is a demand for payment. When the first steps work, the hard steps become rare.
The moment a reminder costs least is when it isn't yet a reminder.
In Italy late payment is the statistical rule, and it's worth knowing
43.4% of Italian businesses pay on time, and 4.1% run up serious delays of more than ninety days. The data comes from the twenty-second edition of the Cribis Payment Study, built on more than 2 billion payment experiences in 37 countries.
The European comparison shows how much this is a matter of the system and not of individual bad customers: in Denmark 94.9% of businesses pay on time, in Poland 86.6%, in the Netherlands 74.7%. Italy has fallen to twenty-first place in Europe.
The operational consequence is precise. Treating every delay as a sign of bad faith leads to writing messages that offend half of the customers who are simply following their usual habits, and the sequence has to be built knowing that, here, late payment is the normal case.
What the law allows, and almost nobody asks for
The right exists and doesn't require a formal demand. Article 6 of Directive 2011/7/EU, transposed in Italy by Legislative Decree 231/2002, puts it this way: «the creditor is entitled to obtain from the debtor, as a minimum, a fixed sum of EUR 40».
Under the same condition late payment interest accrues, calculated on the reference rate plus at least eight percentage points, from the day after the due date. The default payment term between businesses is 30 calendar days, extendable to 60 only by express agreement.
The system calculates these amounts and shows them next to the account, so when you decide to ask for them you know what you are talking about. It doesn't add them to any document on its own, because asking a long-standing customer for interest is a commercial decision, not a calculation.
What the system does, step by step
Every invoice enters the sequence on its issue date and leaves when it shows as collected, and every step leaves a log entry with the outcome.
| Step | What happens | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Calendarfrom the invoices | Due dates are read from the invoices issued, with the terms agreed for that customer. |
No due date depends any longer on a person's memory or on a reminder on the phone. |
| Reconciliationbefore every send | Before sending anything the system compares the account with the recorded payments and with open disputes. |
Whoever has paid receives no reminders, and nobody has to apologise for a message sent by mistake. |
| Reminderbefore the date | An informative message goes out with number, amount and date, asking for confirmation that everything is in order. |
Disputes come out while there is still time, instead of appearing as a reason once the due date has passed. |
| Sequenceprogressive tone | After the due date the steps follow one another at agreed intervals, and the tone changes at each step. |
The customer receives a coherent sequence, not three identical messages followed by silence. |
| Handoverto the person | Beyond the agreed threshold the account leaves the automatic process and is handed to whoever decides, with the full history. |
You make the difficult phone call with all the numbers in front of you, at the right moment and not six months later. |
Reconciliation, the part that makes the rest safe
Almost all tools of this kind send messages by calendar. It works as long as the calendar and reality match, and they almost never do: a bank transfer that arrived yesterday, a deposit recorded by hand, a credit note, a dispute someone received by phone.
Here, before every send, the real state of the account is checked. If it shows as collected it leaves; if it has an open dispute it leaves and goes back to a person; if the amount is partial the message changes and talks about the difference. The rule is deliberately asymmetric: when in doubt the system doesn't send.
The reason is that the two mistakes don't weigh the same. A missed reminder costs a few more days of delay; a reminder sent to a customer who had already paid costs the trust of a customer in good standing, and sometimes the customer.
This check only works if the history is reliable, and that is why this piece rests on the adaptive CRM and on automatic document entry: without payments and documents in order, the reconciliation has nothing to read.
What goes out on its own and what waits for a person
The first two steps, the informative ones, go out on their own, and only on accounts without open disputes. They are messages that report facts already written on the invoice, and the switch to turn them on or off stays yours, customer by customer.
Nothing that commits the business or changes the relationship ever goes out on its own: late payment interest, the flat 40-euro compensation, repayment plans, suspension of supplies, formal demands. They are decisions, and they stay with whoever takes them.
Where a message goes out automatically, it states in one line that it is a system. From 2 August 2026 Article 50 of the AI Act applies, and how we say it is on the AI transparency page. The reasoning about the human constraint is on the page about the principles we build with.
The same thing changes name with the trade
The sequence is identical; the due date that slips isn't. It is worth looking at your own case, because that is where you see how much money is sitting outside.
| Sector | The due date that slips today | Where you see it |
|---|---|---|
| Food and agricultureand export | The foreign distributor's balance at sixty or ninety days, with different terms for each country and nobody keeping count. |
|
| Hospitalityaccommodation and events | The deposits that were due thirty days after confirmation and the balance after the event, when attention has already moved to the next date. |
|
| Restaurantsand bars | The invoices to companies for business lunches and group dinners, which are few and precisely for that reason nobody chases them. |
The service of a dining room where the phone rings unanswered |
What this piece doesn't do
It isn't a debt collection agency and doesn't send formal demands. It prepares, reminds, calculates and hands the account to a person; legal action and out-of-court recovery are another trade and stay with those who practise it.
It doesn't tell you whom to sell to and doesn't decide a customer's credit limit. It shows how they have paid in the past, which is useful information before accepting a large order, and the decision stays yours.
It doesn't record payments on your behalf and doesn't touch the accounts. It reads what is already recorded, and every accounting or tax choice stays with whoever signs it, as with the other pieces of the system.
Questions and answers
When does the first message go out?
Before the due date, not after. The first message doesn't ask for money: it recalls the invoice, the date and the amount, and asks for confirmation that everything is in order.
It is the moment when a dispute comes to light while there is still time to resolve it, instead of appearing thirty days later as the reason for non-payment.
And if the customer has already paid?
They receive nothing, because the system reconciles with the recorded payments before every send and removes from the sequence whatever shows as paid. The same goes for invoices with an open dispute: they leave the automatic sequence and go back to a person.
A reminder sent to someone who has already paid is the fastest way to lose a customer who was in good standing.
Can we charge interest and recovery costs?
Yes, and the law provides for it. European Directive 2011/7/EU, transposed in Italy by Legislative Decree 231/2002, gives the creditor the right to late payment interest and to a flat sum of 40 euros for recovery costs, without the need for a formal reminder.
The system calculates and shows these amounts, but doesn't add them to a document on its own: asking for them is a commercial decision and stays with whoever takes it.
Don't we risk seeming aggressive with good customers?
The risk exists, and it is why the sequence is progressive and reconciled. The first two steps are informative and mention only number, date and amount; the tone changes from the third onwards, and every step up in tone is decided by a person looking at that customer.
In Italy late payment is the statistical norm, not a sign of bad faith: in the latest Cribis survey 43.4% of businesses pay on time.
How do you measure whether it's working?
With the average days of delay on the invoices collected, measured before and after over the same window and on the same customers. The second number is the share of due dates that receive at least one reminder before the date, which at the start is zero in many businesses.
The third is how many disputes come to light before the due date rather than after, because that is where you see whether the first message is doing its job.
Notes on sources
- The 43.4% of Italian businesses that pay on time, the 4.1% with serious delays over ninety days and the comparisons with Denmark, Poland and the Netherlands are from the twenty-second edition of the Cribis Payment Study, referring to the last quarter of 2025. The base is more than 2 billion payment experiences collected in the company's network in 37 countries: it is a private observatory built on its own credit management data, not a public survey, and we say so.
- The right to the flat 40-euro sum and to late payment interest, the default 30-day term and the margin of at least eight percentage points are in Articles 3, 4 and 6 of Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payment, transposed in Italy by Legislative Decree 231/2002. It is a rule, so it has no sample. We don't provide legal advice: how much and when to ask remains your choice, possibly with your own adviser.
- This page doesn't report results obtained for a client, because this piece hasn't yet been delivered to a client. The tests cited are functional checks carried out in testing.
The other pieces in this group
Money you are owed that arrives late, or neverFifteen minutes, with your case in front of us.
How much money is out right now, and for how many days? If answering means opening the management software and adding up by hand, that is already the measure of the problem. In fifteen minutes on the phone we look at it together and tell you where it makes sense to start, even if we don't end up working together.
You get Mattia Esposito, who then builds the system: there's no salesperson in between. If you'd rather measure on your own before talking, the Diagnostico (in Italian) is twenty questions and five minutes.