Tailored AI systems
for Italian SMEs.
Every business pays a price it cannot see.
We find it, we count it, and we build the system that closes it.
No business pays all of them.
We can start from just one.
Accounting records what happened. There is no entry for the order that never arrived, or for the customer who stopped without a word. Open a line to see how it shows up, and which number tells you whether it has been closed.
Requests that come in and never get answered
The request that arrived on Saturday morning, answered by someone on Monday at nine.
They come from WhatsApp, the website, email, the phone. Whoever answers first gets the order.
Time to first responseThe contact that goes cold without ever saying no
The quote sent and never picked up again. The customer who bought only once.
Nobody said no. That contact was simply never given a next step.
Contacts with an assigned stepMoney already yours that arrives late
The March invoice, collected in May.
Overdue invoices get chased when someone remembers, and someone remembers when the day allows it.
Average days to collectHours spent redoing the same things by hand every day
Data copied from one sheet to another, with the occasional error that slips through and is found later.
A machine would do it the same way, and it doesn't skip a line when the phone rings.
Documents processed without interventionPeople looking for you who can't find you
They search for exactly what you do, and open someone else's website.
It happens on a search engine as well as inside an AI assistant, which by now answers in place of the list of results.
Conversions, average position, leads generatedDeadlines that pass while you work
The renewal discovered the day after, the grant call read after it closed.
Nobody checks them because they are nobody's job.
Days of noticeTwo numbers for scale, from the market and not from us: answering within five minutes makes contact up to a hundred times more likely (Harvard Business Review), and European businesses lose an average of seventy-three days a year chasing payments (Intrum, European Payment Report).
You have been told you need to go digital.
And it's true, but only where it's needed.
of Italian SMEs already use artificial intelligence tools.
Sibill · Astraricerche, Osservatorio 2026, 500 SMEs up to €10Mhave built it into their processes. For the rest, it's occasional use of a chat.
Sibill · Astraricerche, Osservatorio 2026The difference between those two isn't the software bought. It's having looked at where the company was losing before buying. The other numbers, with sources →
First we count. Then we build.
| When | What happens | What you have in hand |
|---|---|---|
| 15 minutes | We look at how you work and line up the steps that are losing. | The line that weighs most, and how much it weighs. |
| Day 1 | We decide the number used to measure, and take it before touching anything. | The starting value, in writing. |
| Days 2 to 30 | We build one process only: the one chosen, not four at once. | The system running, credentials included. |
| Day 30 | We put the same starting number in front of you again. | The comparison. No renewal, no penalty. |
How this differs from a web agency or a consultancy, dimension by dimension, and the four things we never do: they are written in the method →
Three things we commit to doing.
A system that works in your place needs someone watching it while you sleep. Monitoring is automatic 24/7, our response is human. No exceptions.
We use another technology, or nothing. We don't sell artificial intelligence, we sell the result: if we put it where it isn't needed the bill wouldn't go down, and on day thirty you would see it in the number.
Tools, suppliers and boundaries are listed one by one, and can be changed. AI transparency →
Some of the results of our systems.
What they actually do, timed. Open a row to see what it was measured on.
From request to ready reply: in 7.290 s
A hundred real requests: orders, reorders, complaints, customs questions, reminders. Four channels, five languages.
A hundred real requests across four channels and in five languages: these are the seconds from arrival to a draft ready for approval, median over a hundred. Twenty arriving in the same second were all closed, all twenty, in twenty-one seconds, which is the moment when a person has to choose which one to ignore. A hundred in, a hundred out with their reply, and the right priority assigned a hundred times out of a hundred: complaints and customs at the top, payments and junk mail at the bottom.
By hand the same request takes four to ten minutes, and that is a declared estimate: read, understand, look up the data, write, reread. The seconds are timed, the minutes are not.
From message to contact already queued: in 4.262 s
A contact writing on WhatsApp, read and queued with their next step already assigned.
Median over nineteen contacts that actually arrived, not simulated. Nobody is left without a next step, which is the point: contacts don't go cold by themselves, they go cold when nobody touches them.
19 contacts · real traffic, August 2026Fields captured correctly per document: 98.7% (for a reason)
Thirty working documents: invoices, delivery notes, technical sheets, orders. Five languages, three different layouts.
Two hundred and thirty-four correct fields out of two hundred and thirty-seven, and the document type recognised thirty times out of thirty: invoice, delivery note, technical sheet or order, in five languages and three different layouts. We had hidden an unreadable one in the pile on purpose, and it set it aside instead of making up the numbers.
The three missed fields have a reason, and we state it: twice the same defect, an amount equal to zero left blank instead of written as zero, and once a country that wasn't written on the document and had to be inferred. None of the three is an invented value.
Time per document: 6.264 s
Open the PDF, find the fields, copy them into the management software, check again.
Six point three seconds per document, median over thirty. By hand the same document takes three to eight minutes, and that is a declared estimate: the seconds are timed, the minutes are not.
30 documents · 4 September 2026From a list to ten names to contact: 389 profiles in an hour (for a client)
The founder of a management SaaS for the beauty sector was looking for Italian professionals to work with, within a specific window of time. Five professions, six cities, no bought list.
Twenty-two searches, three hundred and eighty-nine names collected, ten delivered in order of priority: 2.6%. In between, two filters, the thresholds he set himself, and a manual reading, profile by profile, of the thirty that remained. One hour and four minutes from the first search to delivery. By hand the same work takes a week, and somewhere around the two-hundredth name you stop reading and start scrolling.
For three of the ten, the problem had been written in public by them: one had asked customers to write to him again because he had lost some messages, two take bookings by hand. For those three the first message was already ready, built on what they had published.
We measured the other rows on this page on our own systems. This one was received by a person outside Itria, and the sentence is theirs, written in public: “Within an hour I received a PDF with all the information.”
From the list to ready emails: from 428 candidates to 10 hyper-personalised emails
Five public exhibitor lists, no contact bought, no paid list.
Twenty minutes in all, for what takes a salesperson a whole day. Four hundred and twenty-eight names read, sixty-four websites found and confirmed one by one, ten emails written with a defect verified on that single company's website: none of the ten could be sent to anyone else.
Run of 4 September 2026 · 428 namesWrong companies discarded before writing: 19
A tube-bender manufacturer, a restaurant, a domain for sale, a Chinese gaming page.
Nineteen companies had the right name and someone else's website. They were stopped before entering the list, not after the email went out: the step that caught them is checking the website against its content, and it is the one that pays off most in the whole chain.
Run of 4 September 2026 · out of 428 namesThe server is monitored from outside: for 124 days, 35,700 checks
An external check that asks the machine whether the systems are running, every five minutes, day and night.
An external check asks the machine whether the systems are running every five minutes, day and night, for a hundred and twenty-four days: about thirty-five thousand seven hundred checks. It comes from outside, so it doesn't depend on the machine it is watching.
And underneath, every single process is logged: when it started, what it worked on, how it ended. Three hundred and fifty-six log entries between 18 May and 26 August. No engine runs in the dark, and when something breaks the response is human.
Measured on Itria test systems, except where real traffic or a delivery to a client is stated. Where there is an estimate instead of a measurement, the row says so. The lines on the bill that don't yet have a number of our own stay off this page until they do.
Within an hour I received a PDF with all the information.
The ones everyone asks, rightly.
How much does it cost?
There is no price list, and it isn't reticence. The price depends on how large and customised the system is, and on how long it takes us to design it, test it and set it up with your data. All these variables depend on your volumes. Giving you a figure now would mean making it up.
How long does it take?
Thirty days at most for the first piece, and the starting number is taken on day one. At the end of the thirty days there is no automatic renewal and no penalty: the system stays yours, credentials included.
And our data?
It stays yours. Which tools handle what, where the data ends up and how far each supplier reaches is written down one by one, and can be changed. The full page →
Do we have to change our management software?
No. We build around what you already use: the system reads and writes where you work today. Changing management software is a project of its own, and it doesn't fit in thirty days.
Our team isn't technical.
The system works on its own and brings the result where you already look: email, the phone, the spreadsheet you open every morning. If using it means learning something, it's built wrong.
We already tried AI and not much changed.
That's the normal case, not the exception: it's the gap between the 81% who use it and the 25% who have put it into their work. A tool in one person's hands helps that half hour; it doesn't touch the step the company repeats eighty times a month. How that gap closes →
There's no switchboard and no salesperson.
On the call, on the phone, on WhatsApp and by email, you get the same person who then builds the system and watches over it afterwards.
We decide together which number to watch before we start, and I put it back in front of you after thirty days.
- Phone
- 350 574 3578
- Even just two lines
- info@itria.io
- The profile
- On your own
- The Diagnostico, 5 minutes (in Italian)
Where we started: food and agriculture businesses that export, hospitality, restaurants. The method doesn't change with the sector: what changes is the line you start from. · Where I come from →
Fifteen minutes, and you know how much it is weighing on you.
The steps that are losing, lined up. A figure, and the line to start from.
No quote, no contract, nobody calling you back in the days after.
I work with a few companies at a time.
